mohammad reza danesh shahraki
Abstract
The idea of the proponents of the traditional approach to jurisprudence, based on traditional relations, has always been based on common concepts such as "Islam" and "Muslim community", ...
Read More
The idea of the proponents of the traditional approach to jurisprudence, based on traditional relations, has always been based on common concepts such as "Islam" and "Muslim community", the obligation to protect "Islam" and deny the domination of "infidels", but this idea is inevitable today. Attention is paid to concepts based on new relationships in which "land-based nation" has replaced "belief-based nation." Concepts that are not only not necessarily Islamic, but in some cases may also conflict with the interests of other Muslims in the world. In other words, today, the special function of the "Denial of Domination" rule is faced with a conceptual evolution in the word "alien". "Alien" as the subject of the traditional interpretation of the rule of "Denial of Domination" was an ideological alienation, and "alien" as the subject of the new interpretation of it is a geographical alienation. This conceptual transformation based on the belief in the land is the result of the development and expansion of the idea that emerged in the sciences and human relations after the Treaty of Westphalia, and Shiite jurisprudence has been forced to pay attention to it. The author of this article seeks to evaluate the capacity of the jurisprudential rule of "Denial of Domination" in order to face this change in the field of human thought.
